People ask me why I chose to self-publish instead of pursuing traditional publishing.
It’s a fair question. Traditional publishing comes with validation, support, and an established infrastructure. Self-publishing comes with… all the work and all the risk.
So why did I choose the harder path?
Here’s the honest answer.
I Researched Traditional Publishing First
I want to be clear: I didn’t choose self-publishing because I was too lazy or scared to try traditional publishing.
I went to writers’ conferences. I took courses on finding agents and writing queries. I researched the process thoroughly.
I seriously considered the traditional route.
But the more I learned about traditional publishing, the more I realized it wasn’t the right fit for my book or for what I wanted.
My Book Didn’t Fit What They Were Looking For
Here’s the reality I discovered: traditional publishers were primarily looking for spicy books.
And my book is closed door.
I write fade-to-black fantasy romance because that’s what feels right for my stories and my comfort level as an author. I’m not interested in changing that to fit market demands.
Could I have found a traditional publisher willing to take on closed door fantasy romance? Maybe. Possibly. But it would have been significantly harder, and I would have been fighting an uphill battle from the start.
Why spend years querying agents and publishers who were looking for something fundamentally different than what I was offering?
I Wanted Control Over My Message
The other thing I learned about traditional publishing: they want control over the message your book gives.
And I get it. Publishers invest money in books, so they want some say in the final product. That’s reasonable from their perspective.
But from my perspective as an author, I wanted full creative control.
I wanted to decide:
- What my covers looked like
- How my characters were portrayed
- What message my story conveyed
- How my book was marketed
- What my timeline looked like
I didn’t want to compromise on the story I wanted to tell or how I wanted to tell it.
Traditional publishing would have required those compromises. Self-publishing didn’t.
The Marketing Reality Changed Everything
Here’s what really solidified my decision: I was going to have to do my own marketing either way.
People think traditional publishing means the publisher handles all the marketing. That’s not true for debut authors, especially in a crowded genre like fantasy romance.
The reality:
- Traditional publishers expect authors to build their own platforms
- Debut authors get minimal marketing support
- You’re responsible for social media, newsletter, blog, all of it
- The publisher might get you into some bookstores, but YOU drive sales
So if I had to do all the marketing work myself regardless of which path I chose, why would I let a publisher take most of the profits?
That’s when it clicked.
If I’m doing all the work anyway—writing, editing (paying for), marketing, platform building—why give someone else 85-90% of the royalties?
Self-publishing meant more work upfront (formatting, cover design, all the logistics). But I was going to learn marketing either way. And with self-publishing, I’d keep significantly more of each sale.
The math made sense. The decision became clear.
I Wasn’t Confident
Here’s what I need you to understand: I wasn’t confident about this decision.
I didn’t wake up one day thinking “I’m going to self-publish and it’s going to be amazing!”
I was scared. I had doubts. I wondered constantly: Is this worth doing?
My fears:
- What if no one reads it?
- What if I’m not good enough?
- What if I fail publicly?
- What if I invest all this time and money and it goes nowhere?
- What if I should have tried traditional publishing harder?
These weren’t small doubts. They were loud, persistent, and often overwhelming.
But you know what I realized?
I would have had those same doubts with traditional publishing. Rejection letters would have made me question if I was good enough. Even if I got published traditionally, I’d worry about sales and reviews and reader response.
The doubts come with the territory of putting your work into the world—regardless of how you publish.
I Moved Forward Anyway
So I made a choice.
I wasn’t confident. But I was going to move forward anyway.
Because waiting until I felt confident meant never moving forward at all.
I chose self-publishing knowing I might fail. Knowing I didn’t have all the answers. Knowing I was going to make mistakes.
But at least if I failed, I’d fail on my own terms with full creative control over my work.
And if I succeeded? I’d succeed with the book I actually wanted to write, marketed the way I wanted to market it, keeping the profits I’d worked for.
That felt worth the risk.
What Self-Publishing Gave Me
Looking back now, here’s what choosing self-publishing allowed me to do:
Full creative control: I designed my own covers. I set my own prices. I chose my release date. I controlled every aspect of my book.
Keep my vision intact: I didn’t have to make my book spicier to appeal to publishers. I didn’t have to change my message or my characters.
Own my timeline: I published when I was ready, not when a publisher’s schedule dictated.
Build my platform my way: I created the author brand I wanted, not what someone else thought would sell.
Keep more profits: Every sale means more to me financially because I’m not splitting royalties 90/10.
Learn everything: I became a better marketer, designer, publisher, and business person. These skills are mine forever.
What I Gave Up
But I also want to be honest about what I gave up by choosing self-publishing:
Traditional validation: There’s no agent who believed in me enough to represent me. No publisher who thought my book was worth their investment. That stings sometimes.
Built-in support: I don’t have a publishing team. I don’t have industry connections. I’m figuring everything out alone (or with the help of other indie authors).
Bookstore presence: Getting into physical bookstores is significantly harder as a self-published author.
Advance money: Traditional publishers pay advances. Self-publishing means I pay upfront costs with no guarantee of return.
Prestige: Whether we like it or not, traditional publishing still carries more prestige in many circles.
These trade-offs were real. I made them knowingly.
The Decision Wasn’t Right or Wrong
Here’s what I’ve learned: there’s no universally “right” choice between traditional and self-publishing.
Traditional publishing is right for some authors:
- Those who write what publishers are actively seeking
- Those who value validation and industry support
- Those who don’t want to handle the business side
- Those who are willing to compromise for professional support
Self-publishing is right for other authors:
- Those who write books that don’t fit current market trends
- Those who value creative control above all else
- Those willing to learn business and marketing
- Those who want to keep more profits
Neither path is better. They’re just different.
I chose self-publishing because it was right for my book, my vision, and my priorities.
Someone else might make the exact opposite choice for equally valid reasons.
If I Had to Decide Again
Would I make the same choice?
Yes.
Even knowing how much work it would be. Even knowing I’d question myself constantly. Even knowing success isn’t guaranteed.
Because self-publishing allowed me to publish the book I actually wanted to write. It gave me control over my creative vision. It taught me skills I’ll use for the rest of my career.
And it proved to me that I could do hard things.
I wasn’t confident when I started. I’m still not confident all the time.
But I did it anyway. And that matters more than confidence ever could.
For Anyone Considering Self-Publishing
If you’re trying to decide between traditional and self-publishing, here’s my advice:
Research both paths thoroughly. Don’t choose out of fear or laziness. Understand what each path requires.
Be honest about your priorities. What matters most to you? Creative control? Validation? Money? Support? Timeline?
Know your book. Does it fit what traditional publishers want? Or is it outside current market trends?
Understand the work involved. Self-publishing isn’t easier than traditional—it’s just different work.
Accept that you might fail. Either path could lead to failure. Choose the path where you’re okay with how you might fail.
You don’t need confidence to move forward. You just need commitment to try.
The Bottom Line
I chose to self-publish because:
My book was closed door in a market looking for spicy.
I wanted full creative control over my message and vision.
I’d have to do all the marketing myself either way, so why give up most of the profits?
I wasn’t confident, but I was willing to try anyway.
Was it the right choice? For me and my book, yes.
Would I recommend it to everyone? No. It depends on your book, your goals, and your priorities.
Do I have regrets? Sometimes I wonder what traditional publishing would have been like. But I don’t regret the choice I made.
Because at the end of the day, I published a book I’m proud of, on my own terms, with full creative control.
And that’s exactly what I wanted.









